https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400492 The Tribunal, citing Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013, ruled in favor of restoring the company's name that was struck off by the Registrar of Companies. The company, engaged in civil services exam coaching, faced strike-off due to non-compliance. Despite acknowledging the appellant's lapses, the Tribunal considered the company's assets and interests of stakeholders, directing restoration within 30 days upon meeting specified conditions and payment of costs. The decision emphasized transparency and adherence to legal requirements in the restoration process. en-us Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Nov 2020 13:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400492 The Tribunal, citing Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013, ruled in favor of restoring the company's name that was struck off by the Registrar of Companies. The company, engaged in civil services exam coaching, faced strike-off due to non-compliance. Despite acknowledging the appellant's lapses, the Tribunal considered the company's assets and interests of stakeholders, directing restoration within 30 days upon meeting specified conditions and payment of costs. The decision emphasized transparency and adherence to legal requirements in the restoration process. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400492