<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 238 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400483</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant, a steel products manufacturer, to avail Cenvat credit on MTOP and FFC charges, overturning the department&#039;s denial. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was influenced by a High Court ruling and a CBEC Instruction, both supporting the appellant&#039;s position that credit should be granted as excise duty was duly paid on these charges. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting the appellant appropriate reliefs under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 238 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400483</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant, a steel products manufacturer, to avail Cenvat credit on MTOP and FFC charges, overturning the department&#039;s denial. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was influenced by a High Court ruling and a CBEC Instruction, both supporting the appellant&#039;s position that credit should be granted as excise duty was duly paid on these charges. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting the appellant appropriate reliefs under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>