<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (11) TMI 87 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291394</link>
    <description>Road, public works and education cesses paid by a coal mining business were held not deductible under section 10(2)(ix) or section 10(2)(xv) read with section 10(4) of the Indian Income Tax Act. The cesses were imposed in relation to the mining operations and were charged on, or by reference to, the business profits or gains, so they did not qualify as land revenue, local rates or municipal taxes. Section 10(4) also barred deduction of any cess, rate or tax levied on or assessed with reference to business profits or gains. The suggested distinction between coal extraction profit and mining-business profit was rejected on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (11) TMI 87 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291394</link>
      <description>Road, public works and education cesses paid by a coal mining business were held not deductible under section 10(2)(ix) or section 10(2)(xv) read with section 10(4) of the Indian Income Tax Act. The cesses were imposed in relation to the mining operations and were charged on, or by reference to, the business profits or gains, so they did not qualify as land revenue, local rates or municipal taxes. Section 10(4) also barred deduction of any cess, rate or tax levied on or assessed with reference to business profits or gains. The suggested distinction between coal extraction profit and mining-business profit was rejected on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>