<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1709 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291381</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the Assessee-Company clandestinely removed goods without paying excise duty. The Court upheld the imposition of duty, penalty, and interest, finding sufficient evidence, including voluntary statements and corroborating documents. No violation of Section 9D was found, and no substantial question of law warranted interference under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1709 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291381</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the Assessee-Company clandestinely removed goods without paying excise duty. The Court upheld the imposition of duty, penalty, and interest, finding sufficient evidence, including voluntary statements and corroborating documents. No violation of Section 9D was found, and no substantial question of law warranted interference under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>