<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 234 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400479</link>
    <description>The dispute concerned whether transitional CENVAT credit could be carried forward into the electronic credit ledger under GST, and whether the rule governing transition and the retrospective amendment to the statutory transition provision were vulnerable to an ultra vires challenge. The matter remained pending, with notice issued and pleadings directed to be completed, while the court awaited the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in connected proceedings before further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 234 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400479</link>
      <description>The dispute concerned whether transitional CENVAT credit could be carried forward into the electronic credit ledger under GST, and whether the rule governing transition and the retrospective amendment to the statutory transition provision were vulnerable to an ultra vires challenge. The matter remained pending, with notice issued and pleadings directed to be completed, while the court awaited the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in connected proceedings before further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>