<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 224 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400469</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO to delete the addition of rental income of Rs. 3,85,85,341 and to disallow 3.41% of common administrative expenses under Section 14A. The Tribunal also upheld the treatment of the security deposit, allowing its adjustment against previous outstanding rent. The appeal was partly allowed with specific directions for recalculating the disallowance and acknowledging the practical aspects of the assessee&#039;s situation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 224 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400469</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO to delete the addition of rental income of Rs. 3,85,85,341 and to disallow 3.41% of common administrative expenses under Section 14A. The Tribunal also upheld the treatment of the security deposit, allowing its adjustment against previous outstanding rent. The appeal was partly allowed with specific directions for recalculating the disallowance and acknowledging the practical aspects of the assessee&#039;s situation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>