<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 212 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400457</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of interest paid against loans from the director and inter corporate deposit. However, the disallowance of interest paid on TDS was affirmed in favor of the revenue. The decision was based on precedents and statutory provisions, with the judgment pronounced on 28/10/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 212 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400457</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of interest paid against loans from the director and inter corporate deposit. However, the disallowance of interest paid on TDS was affirmed in favor of the revenue. The decision was based on precedents and statutory provisions, with the judgment pronounced on 28/10/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>