<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 209 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400454</link>
    <description>Where international transactions were accepted at arm&#039;s length, the Tribunal held that reassessment based on an alleged permanent establishment could not be sustained because no further profit could be attributed once the arm&#039;s length principle was satisfied, and the reopening lacked foundation when the PE basis failed. It also held that a curable defect in the memorandum of appeal regarding the PAN could not justify summary rejection of the assessee&#039;s appeals, since the statutory right of appeal must be construed reasonably and liberally. The reassessment proceedings and the technical dismissal were both set aside, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 209 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400454</link>
      <description>Where international transactions were accepted at arm&#039;s length, the Tribunal held that reassessment based on an alleged permanent establishment could not be sustained because no further profit could be attributed once the arm&#039;s length principle was satisfied, and the reopening lacked foundation when the PE basis failed. It also held that a curable defect in the memorandum of appeal regarding the PAN could not justify summary rejection of the assessee&#039;s appeals, since the statutory right of appeal must be construed reasonably and liberally. The reassessment proceedings and the technical dismissal were both set aside, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>