<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 196 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400441</link>
    <description>Withdrawal of a customs broker licence carrying adverse civil consequences requires prior notice, a reasonable opportunity of hearing, and a reasoned order. A prior intimation that later non-compliance could lead to withdrawal does not satisfy natural justice for the actual withdrawal decision, and the order must disclose its own reasons. The Bombay High Court held the withdrawal unsustainable for breach of natural justice and absence of reasons, and remanded the matter for fresh decision after hearing the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 196 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400441</link>
      <description>Withdrawal of a customs broker licence carrying adverse civil consequences requires prior notice, a reasonable opportunity of hearing, and a reasoned order. A prior intimation that later non-compliance could lead to withdrawal does not satisfy natural justice for the actual withdrawal decision, and the order must disclose its own reasons. The Bombay High Court held the withdrawal unsustainable for breach of natural justice and absence of reasons, and remanded the matter for fresh decision after hearing the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>