<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 192 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400437</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to interest on the seized amount from three months after the original refund application date under Section 11BB. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in rejecting the interest claim based on Section 35FF, as it only applies to amounts deposited under Section 35F. The Tribunal set aside the order and granted the refund with interest, ruling in favor of the appellant on 05.11.2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 08:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 192 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400437</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to interest on the seized amount from three months after the original refund application date under Section 11BB. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in rejecting the interest claim based on Section 35FF, as it only applies to amounts deposited under Section 35F. The Tribunal set aside the order and granted the refund with interest, ruling in favor of the appellant on 05.11.2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>