<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1427 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291350</link>
    <description>Selective reduction of share capital affecting only identified shareholders was held permissible where approved by special resolution, supported by a substantial shareholder majority, and not opposed by creditors. The Tribunal accepted that valuation is not an exact science and upheld the valuer&#039;s use of a two-week VWAP, marketability discount and related assumptions as not ex facie unreasonable. However, deduction of dividend distribution tax from the per-share value was found discriminatory and prejudicial to the affected shareholders, and was disallowed. The reduction was therefore confirmed subject to payment of the full fair value without such deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 08:37:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1427 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291350</link>
      <description>Selective reduction of share capital affecting only identified shareholders was held permissible where approved by special resolution, supported by a substantial shareholder majority, and not opposed by creditors. The Tribunal accepted that valuation is not an exact science and upheld the valuer&#039;s use of a two-week VWAP, marketability discount and related assumptions as not ex facie unreasonable. However, deduction of dividend distribution tax from the per-share value was found discriminatory and prejudicial to the affected shareholders, and was disallowed. The reduction was therefore confirmed subject to payment of the full fair value without such deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>