<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1426 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AMARAVATI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291349</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected an application seeking access to authenticated copies of Liquidation and Fair Valuation Reports under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Resolution Professional objected, citing confidentiality concerns and the absence of a resolution plan. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of maintaining confidentiality and timing, stating that disclosing valuation information prematurely, without a resolution plan and with a decision for liquidation already made, would be inappropriate. Consequently, the application was deemed lacking in merit and rejected based on procedural grounds and the need for proper timing in insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 08:37:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1426 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AMARAVATI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291349</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected an application seeking access to authenticated copies of Liquidation and Fair Valuation Reports under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Resolution Professional objected, citing confidentiality concerns and the absence of a resolution plan. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of maintaining confidentiality and timing, stating that disclosing valuation information prematurely, without a resolution plan and with a decision for liquidation already made, would be inappropriate. Consequently, the application was deemed lacking in merit and rejected based on procedural grounds and the need for proper timing in insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>