<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1500 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291357</link>
    <description>The special leave petition was dismissed after the Court declined to interfere on the facts, but the substantive question of law was expressly left open for future consideration. The dismissal therefore did not amount to an adjudication on the contested legal issue. The Court also clarified that the High Court&#039;s order would operate only in respect of the respondent and would not extend to or affect any other person, limiting the order&#039;s effect to the parties before the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 08:37:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1500 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291357</link>
      <description>The special leave petition was dismissed after the Court declined to interfere on the facts, but the substantive question of law was expressly left open for future consideration. The dismissal therefore did not amount to an adjudication on the contested legal issue. The Court also clarified that the High Court&#039;s order would operate only in respect of the respondent and would not extend to or affect any other person, limiting the order&#039;s effect to the parties before the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>