https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291343 The Supreme Court upheld the lower courts' decisions in a case involving the unlawful dispossession of the plaintiff by defendant No. 3. It was found that defendant No. 3 had obtained possession through collusion and trespass, leading to the plaintiff's unlawful deprivation of possession. The Court emphasized the importance of settled possession and ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the Court Receiver to take possession of the business and premises and restore them to the plaintiff. The appeal was dismissed with costs throughout. en-us Wed, 09 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291343 The Supreme Court upheld the lower courts' decisions in a case involving the unlawful dispossession of the plaintiff by defendant No. 3. It was found that defendant No. 3 had obtained possession through collusion and trespass, leading to the plaintiff's unlawful deprivation of possession. The Court emphasized the importance of settled possession and ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the Court Receiver to take possession of the business and premises and restore them to the plaintiff. The appeal was dismissed with costs throughout. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291343