https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400429 In bail matters arising from the same FIR alleging IPC and Jharkhand GST Act offences, the HC required further factual clarification on the petitioners' link to the GST registration and business activity, the alleged use of documents to obtain GSTIN, and the asserted GST defalcation. It also directed the Assistant Commissioner, Sales Tax, Dhanbad Circle, to file separate detailed counter affidavits in both cases on involvement and alleged tax evasion, and directed the Superintendent of Police, Dhanbad, to file an affidavit concerning the certificate relied on by one petitioner. The matters were adjourned for further consideration after three weeks. en-us Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400429 In bail matters arising from the same FIR alleging IPC and Jharkhand GST Act offences, the HC required further factual clarification on the petitioners' link to the GST registration and business activity, the alleged use of documents to obtain GSTIN, and the asserted GST defalcation. It also directed the Assistant Commissioner, Sales Tax, Dhanbad Circle, to file separate detailed counter affidavits in both cases on involvement and alleged tax evasion, and directed the Superintendent of Police, Dhanbad, to file an affidavit concerning the certificate relied on by one petitioner. The matters were adjourned for further consideration after three weeks. Case-Laws GST Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400429