<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court to Decide on Classification of Imported Used Rubber Tyres: Reusable or Scrap? Writ Court Won&#039;t Preempt Decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55419</link>
    <description>Classification of imported goods - goods are old and used rubber tyres reusable as tyres or are old and used rubber tyres scrap being in pressed baled form? - this aspect should be best left to the adjudicating authority to decide, if it requires adjudication. Pre-empting an adjudication on this issue by the writ court by taking a view one way or the other may not be justified. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 09:40:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 09:40:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court to Decide on Classification of Imported Used Rubber Tyres: Reusable or Scrap? Writ Court Won&#039;t Preempt Decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55419</link>
      <description>Classification of imported goods - goods are old and used rubber tyres reusable as tyres or are old and used rubber tyres scrap being in pressed baled form? - this aspect should be best left to the adjudicating authority to decide, if it requires adjudication. Pre-empting an adjudication on this issue by the writ court by taking a view one way or the other may not be justified. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 09:40:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>