<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 153 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400398</link>
    <description>Notices seeking to tax commission received from financial institutions as Business Auxiliary Service became moot after the implementation of GST from 1 July 2017, because service tax was subsumed into the new tax regime. With no live controversy remaining for adjudication, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 09:06:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 153 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400398</link>
      <description>Notices seeking to tax commission received from financial institutions as Business Auxiliary Service became moot after the implementation of GST from 1 July 2017, because service tax was subsumed into the new tax regime. With no live controversy remaining for adjudication, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>