<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1544 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291326</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeals. It emphasized that the customs department cannot reject declared invoice values without specific evidence, and NIDB data alone is insufficient for customs duty assessment. The decision reinforced the necessity of concrete evidence for rejecting declared values, ensuring fair customs valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1544 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291326</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeals. It emphasized that the customs department cannot reject declared invoice values without specific evidence, and NIDB data alone is insufficient for customs duty assessment. The decision reinforced the necessity of concrete evidence for rejecting declared values, ensuring fair customs valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>