https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291324 The appellant successfully argued for the classification of 'Potato Flakes' under Chapter 1105 20 00, resulting in nil duty, as opposed to Revenue's classification under Chapter 20 with a 5% ad valorem duty. The Tribunal's precedent set in previous decisions supported this classification, leading to the impugned order being set aside, and the appeal allowed with consequential relief. Additionally, as the classification issue was resolved in favor of the appellant, the appeals related to provisional release of seized goods and quantification of duty were deemed infructuous and dismissed accordingly. en-us Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Nov 2020 09:06:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291324 The appellant successfully argued for the classification of 'Potato Flakes' under Chapter 1105 20 00, resulting in nil duty, as opposed to Revenue's classification under Chapter 20 with a 5% ad valorem duty. The Tribunal's precedent set in previous decisions supported this classification, leading to the impugned order being set aside, and the appeal allowed with consequential relief. Additionally, as the classification issue was resolved in favor of the appellant, the appeals related to provisional release of seized goods and quantification of duty were deemed infructuous and dismissed accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291324