https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291321 The High Court quashed the rejection of the petitioner's refund application by the Assistant Commissioner, finding it unjustified. The court directed the Assistant Commissioner to decide on the refund applications within two months of the order receipt. The judgment underscores the significance of factual accuracy in administrative decisions, compliance with court orders, and the obligation of authorities to consider refund applications in line with the law. Procedural fairness and adherence to judicial directives were emphasized throughout the legal process. en-us Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Nov 2020 17:33:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291321 The High Court quashed the rejection of the petitioner's refund application by the Assistant Commissioner, finding it unjustified. The court directed the Assistant Commissioner to decide on the refund applications within two months of the order receipt. The judgment underscores the significance of factual accuracy in administrative decisions, compliance with court orders, and the obligation of authorities to consider refund applications in line with the law. Procedural fairness and adherence to judicial directives were emphasized throughout the legal process. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291321