<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 145 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400390</link>
    <description>Mesne profits and interest received for unauthorised occupation of leased immovable property were treated as revenue receipts, because the payment compensated the owner for continued use of the property after termination of the lease and substituted the rent or occupation value otherwise receivable. The capital asset remained intact; there was no sterilisation, destruction, or diminution of the asset itself. On that basis, the receipt was not a capital receipt and was taxable as income in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 145 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400390</link>
      <description>Mesne profits and interest received for unauthorised occupation of leased immovable property were treated as revenue receipts, because the payment compensated the owner for continued use of the property after termination of the lease and substituted the rent or occupation value otherwise receivable. The capital asset remained intact; there was no sterilisation, destruction, or diminution of the asset itself. On that basis, the receipt was not a capital receipt and was taxable as income in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>