<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 137 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an owner of a cinema hall, in a tax dispute regarding the provision of &quot;renting of immovable property&quot; services to film distributors. The Tribunal found that the agreements between the parties did not constitute a renting or leasing arrangement, as the cinema hall was used by the appellant to screen films, not by the distributors. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that other income heads such as &quot;Car Parking Hire,&quot; &quot;Shorts and Slides,&quot; &quot;Rent Received,&quot; and &quot;Miscellaneous Receipts&quot; were either below the taxable threshold or exempt, leading to the dismissal of the service tax demands. The appeal was allowed, and all demands were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 137 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an owner of a cinema hall, in a tax dispute regarding the provision of &quot;renting of immovable property&quot; services to film distributors. The Tribunal found that the agreements between the parties did not constitute a renting or leasing arrangement, as the cinema hall was used by the appellant to screen films, not by the distributors. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that other income heads such as &quot;Car Parking Hire,&quot; &quot;Shorts and Slides,&quot; &quot;Rent Received,&quot; and &quot;Miscellaneous Receipts&quot; were either below the taxable threshold or exempt, leading to the dismissal of the service tax demands. The appeal was allowed, and all demands were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>