<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 135 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400380</link>
    <description>Delay in filing appeals for two assessment years was condoned by the Tribunal due to the assessee&#039;s belief based on legal advice. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to adjudicate issues not covered under Section 263 proceedings related to software expenses, deduction computation under Section 10A, Transfer Pricing adjustments, and jurisdiction of CIT(A) to decide on additional issues. The CIT(A) was instructed to review these matters on their merits. The appeals were considered allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 13:08:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 135 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400380</link>
      <description>Delay in filing appeals for two assessment years was condoned by the Tribunal due to the assessee&#039;s belief based on legal advice. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to adjudicate issues not covered under Section 263 proceedings related to software expenses, deduction computation under Section 10A, Transfer Pricing adjustments, and jurisdiction of CIT(A) to decide on additional issues. The CIT(A) was instructed to review these matters on their merits. The appeals were considered allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>