<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 130 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400375</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal as the tax effect was below the monetary limit set by the CBDT for appeals before the Appellate Tribunal. The CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions under sections 68 and 69C of the IT Act was upheld based on the low tax effect, despite arguments regarding incriminating documents and statements. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the case due to the monetary grounds, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and rejection of the Revenue&#039;s application for rectification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 12:46:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 130 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400375</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal as the tax effect was below the monetary limit set by the CBDT for appeals before the Appellate Tribunal. The CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions under sections 68 and 69C of the IT Act was upheld based on the low tax effect, despite arguments regarding incriminating documents and statements. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the case due to the monetary grounds, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and rejection of the Revenue&#039;s application for rectification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>