https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400369 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal as the Adjudicating Authority's decision under Section 9 of the IBC was upheld. The existence of a pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the operational debt was established through the Respondent's communications and the debit note raised for service deficiencies. The Tribunal found no legal infirmity in the Adjudicating Authority's decision, aligning with the principles set forth in the "Mobilox Innovations" case, and concluded that the Appellant failed to substantiate their claims. en-us Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400369 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal as the Adjudicating Authority's decision under Section 9 of the IBC was upheld. The existence of a pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the operational debt was established through the Respondent's communications and the debit note raised for service deficiencies. The Tribunal found no legal infirmity in the Adjudicating Authority's decision, aligning with the principles set forth in the "Mobilox Innovations" case, and concluded that the Appellant failed to substantiate their claims. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400369