<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1840 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291289</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal against a communication for provisional assessment of goods, finding that the communication did not constitute a decision or order by the Commissioner of Customs as required by Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that since the communication did not meet the criteria of being a decision or order by the Commissioner, the appeal was not maintainable. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of dismissing the appeal for lack of substance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 12:20:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1840 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291289</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal against a communication for provisional assessment of goods, finding that the communication did not constitute a decision or order by the Commissioner of Customs as required by Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that since the communication did not meet the criteria of being a decision or order by the Commissioner, the appeal was not maintainable. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of dismissing the appeal for lack of substance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>