<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1307 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291305</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its authority by delegating judicial functions to a Committee for decisions on exemptions under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court deemed this delegation unconstitutional, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order and dismissing writ petitions challenging the Committee&#039;s decision-making authority. Additionally, challenges against investing the Committee with judicial powers were rejected, emphasizing that judicial functions cannot be delegated. The matters were remanded to the High Court for proper adjudication in accordance with the law, allowing parties to submit additional affidavits for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 12:20:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1307 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291305</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its authority by delegating judicial functions to a Committee for decisions on exemptions under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court deemed this delegation unconstitutional, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order and dismissing writ petitions challenging the Committee&#039;s decision-making authority. Additionally, challenges against investing the Committee with judicial powers were rejected, emphasizing that judicial functions cannot be delegated. The matters were remanded to the High Court for proper adjudication in accordance with the law, allowing parties to submit additional affidavits for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>