https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400355 The court held that the detention of the consignment in transit was not justified based on the non-registration of the consignor or mis-classification of goods. Despite the absence of a delivery challan, a valid e-way bill covered the transportation, and the liability of the petitioner for the release of the goods was determined under Section 129(1)(b) of the GST Act. The court directed the release of the goods and the vehicle upon the petitioner paying Rs. 25,000, as per the provisions of the GST Act. en-us Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400355 The court held that the detention of the consignment in transit was not justified based on the non-registration of the consignor or mis-classification of goods. Despite the absence of a delivery challan, a valid e-way bill covered the transportation, and the liability of the petitioner for the release of the goods was determined under Section 129(1)(b) of the GST Act. The court directed the release of the goods and the vehicle upon the petitioner paying Rs. 25,000, as per the provisions of the GST Act. Case-Laws GST Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400355