https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400350 The Respondent in this case was found to have violated Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 by not passing on the benefit of the GST rate reduction to customers. The total profiteered amount was determined to be Rs. 1,91,21,441, and the Respondent was directed to deposit this amount in the Consumer Welfare Funds along with applicable interest. The Authority's order highlighted the importance of businesses complying with anti-profiteering provisions to ensure that the benefits of tax reductions are transferred to consumers. en-us Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400350 The Respondent in this case was found to have violated Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 by not passing on the benefit of the GST rate reduction to customers. The total profiteered amount was determined to be Rs. 1,91,21,441, and the Respondent was directed to deposit this amount in the Consumer Welfare Funds along with applicable interest. The Authority's order highlighted the importance of businesses complying with anti-profiteering provisions to ensure that the benefits of tax reductions are transferred to consumers. Case-Laws GST Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400350