<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 100 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400345</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of interpreting the definition of &quot;Urban Land&quot; in alignment with zoning regulations and construction restrictions. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the issues raised, considering legal precedents and relevant circulars to support the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 100 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400345</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of interpreting the definition of &quot;Urban Land&quot; in alignment with zoning regulations and construction restrictions. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the issues raised, considering legal precedents and relevant circulars to support the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>