<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 82 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the lower authority to quantify the refund amount eligible for the appellant after complying with the relevant rules. The Tribunal emphasized that the refund being of input service credit, the question of unjust enrichment did not arise in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 19:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 82 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the lower authority to quantify the refund amount eligible for the appellant after complying with the relevant rules. The Tribunal emphasized that the refund being of input service credit, the question of unjust enrichment did not arise in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>