<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1356 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291283</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11, instructing the TPO to reassess the comparables in alignment with the assessee&#039;s business activities to accurately determine the Arm&#039;s Length Price. The decision emphasized using comparables relevant to the distribution of television channels, similar to a precedent set by the ITAT Delhi Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1356 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291283</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11, instructing the TPO to reassess the comparables in alignment with the assessee&#039;s business activities to accurately determine the Arm&#039;s Length Price. The decision emphasized using comparables relevant to the distribution of television channels, similar to a precedent set by the ITAT Delhi Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>