<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1836 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291281</link>
    <description>Freezing a Municipality&#039;s bank accounts was treated as unwarranted at the interim stage because it caused serious prejudice and interfered with essential public functions. The court noted that, given the nature of municipal activities, restraint on account operations would impede normal governance and public service delivery. Interim stay was therefore granted against the freezing order, and the bank was directed to allow normal operation of the accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1836 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291281</link>
      <description>Freezing a Municipality&#039;s bank accounts was treated as unwarranted at the interim stage because it caused serious prejudice and interfered with essential public functions. The court noted that, given the nature of municipal activities, restraint on account operations would impede normal governance and public service delivery. Interim stay was therefore granted against the freezing order, and the bank was directed to allow normal operation of the accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>