https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291268 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, ruling that the addition of Rs. 4,12,30,153/- by the Assessing Officer disallowing sub-contract expenditure was unjustified. The CIT(A) found the sub-contract work genuine, supported by additional evidence provided by the assessee. The delayed payments were explained and deemed legitimate. The revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)'s order. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2020 18:02:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291268 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, ruling that the addition of Rs. 4,12,30,153/- by the Assessing Officer disallowing sub-contract expenditure was unjustified. The CIT(A) found the sub-contract work genuine, supported by additional evidence provided by the assessee. The delayed payments were explained and deemed legitimate. The revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)'s order. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291268