https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291273 The court upheld the constitutionality of the challenged provisions and rules under the CGST Act, 2017. It emphasized the presumption in favor of constitutionality and placed the burden of proof on the petitioners to show any constitutional violations. The court denied interim reliefs sought by the petitioners but allowed the submission and pending status of refund applications until the final disposal of the writ petitions. The writ petitions were scheduled for further hearing on 15-4-2019. en-us Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291273 The court upheld the constitutionality of the challenged provisions and rules under the CGST Act, 2017. It emphasized the presumption in favor of constitutionality and placed the burden of proof on the petitioners to show any constitutional violations. The court denied interim reliefs sought by the petitioners but allowed the submission and pending status of refund applications until the final disposal of the writ petitions. The writ petitions were scheduled for further hearing on 15-4-2019. Case-Laws GST Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291273