<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 66 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400311</link>
    <description>The Tribunal annulled the reassessment for the year 2005-06 as it was based on a mere change of opinion without new material. The Tribunal upheld the treatment of design and development expenses as capital expenditure but directed depreciation. R&amp;amp;D expenses disallowance was partially upheld, allowing depreciation on the capitalized amount. The provision for warranty was dismissed. Sales commission disallowance was upheld due to lack of evidence. Interest disallowance was upheld as capital but allowed consequential depreciation. Disallowance of reimbursement of expenses was upheld due to failure to withhold tax. The Tribunal granted relief in favor of the assessee on the reopening of assessment and provided partial relief on other issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 66 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400311</link>
      <description>The Tribunal annulled the reassessment for the year 2005-06 as it was based on a mere change of opinion without new material. The Tribunal upheld the treatment of design and development expenses as capital expenditure but directed depreciation. R&amp;amp;D expenses disallowance was partially upheld, allowing depreciation on the capitalized amount. The provision for warranty was dismissed. Sales commission disallowance was upheld due to lack of evidence. Interest disallowance was upheld as capital but allowed consequential depreciation. Disallowance of reimbursement of expenses was upheld due to failure to withhold tax. The Tribunal granted relief in favor of the assessee on the reopening of assessment and provided partial relief on other issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>