<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 61 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , SPECIAL BENCH, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400306</link>
    <description>The scheme of amalgamation was sanctioned after the Tribunal found that the companies had completed the required corporate and statutory compliances, issued the necessary notices, and satisfactorily answered the Regional Director&#039;s objections through undertakings and clarifications. The Official Liquidator reported that the transferor companies&#039; affairs had been conducted properly, and the scheme was held fair, reasonable, and not contrary to law or public policy. The appointed date fixed under the scheme was accepted, and the transferor companies were directed to stand dissolved without winding up.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 61 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , SPECIAL BENCH, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400306</link>
      <description>The scheme of amalgamation was sanctioned after the Tribunal found that the companies had completed the required corporate and statutory compliances, issued the necessary notices, and satisfactorily answered the Regional Director&#039;s objections through undertakings and clarifications. The Official Liquidator reported that the transferor companies&#039; affairs had been conducted properly, and the scheme was held fair, reasonable, and not contrary to law or public policy. The appointed date fixed under the scheme was accepted, and the transferor companies were directed to stand dissolved without winding up.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>