<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Conviction Based Solely on Confession Under NDPS Act Section 67: Constitutional Concerns and Evidence Act Implications.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55370</link>
    <description>Validity of conviction made - conviction based solely on the purported confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act - evidentiary value present or not - to arrive at the conclusion that a confessional statement made before an officer designated under section 42 or section 53 can be the basis to convict a person under the NDPS Act, without any non obstante clause doing away with section 25 of the Evidence Act, and without any safeguards, would be a direct infringement of the constitutional guarantees contained in Articles 14, 20(3) and 21 of the Constitution of India. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:17:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:17:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Conviction Based Solely on Confession Under NDPS Act Section 67: Constitutional Concerns and Evidence Act Implications.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55370</link>
      <description>Validity of conviction made - conviction based solely on the purported confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act - evidentiary value present or not - to arrive at the conclusion that a confessional statement made before an officer designated under section 42 or section 53 can be the basis to convict a person under the NDPS Act, without any non obstante clause doing away with section 25 of the Evidence Act, and without any safeguards, would be a direct infringement of the constitutional guarantees contained in Articles 14, 20(3) and 21 of the Constitution of India. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:17:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>