<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 52 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400297</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow additional depreciation in the subsequent year. The Court relied on legal precedents, including the Division Bench and Supreme Court rulings, to support its decision. It emphasized the importance of following established legal principles in tax matters and concluded that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was appropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:17:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 52 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400297</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow additional depreciation in the subsequent year. The Court relied on legal precedents, including the Division Bench and Supreme Court rulings, to support its decision. It emphasized the importance of following established legal principles in tax matters and concluded that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was appropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>