https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400296 The High Court of Madras dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the Petitioner for challenging an order by the Respondent demanding differential duty, interest, and penalty for imported goods. The Court emphasized the importance of exhausting statutory remedies, specifically the appeal process under Section 128 of the Customs Act, before resorting to writ jurisdiction. The judgment underscored the need to discourage bypassing statutory procedures and highlighted that writ jurisdiction should not be used to circumvent established processes unless exceptional circumstances exist. The Court closed the case without costs, emphasizing adherence to prescribed statutory procedures before seeking court intervention. en-us Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:17:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400296 The High Court of Madras dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the Petitioner for challenging an order by the Respondent demanding differential duty, interest, and penalty for imported goods. The Court emphasized the importance of exhausting statutory remedies, specifically the appeal process under Section 128 of the Customs Act, before resorting to writ jurisdiction. The judgment underscored the need to discourage bypassing statutory procedures and highlighted that writ jurisdiction should not be used to circumvent established processes unless exceptional circumstances exist. The Court closed the case without costs, emphasizing adherence to prescribed statutory procedures before seeking court intervention. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400296