<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 46 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400291</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 9,85,00,000/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently proven the identity, creditworthiness of the lender, and the genuineness of the transaction through comprehensive documentation. It was noted that the AO&#039;s addition was solely based on the investigation wing&#039;s report without independent corroborative evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s compliance with Section 68 requirements and the AO&#039;s failure to conduct a proper investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2021 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 46 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400291</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 9,85,00,000/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently proven the identity, creditworthiness of the lender, and the genuineness of the transaction through comprehensive documentation. It was noted that the AO&#039;s addition was solely based on the investigation wing&#039;s report without independent corroborative evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s compliance with Section 68 requirements and the AO&#039;s failure to conduct a proper investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>