<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 45 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400290</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, finding sufficient evidence to prove the identity and creditworthiness of the lenders under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The additions made by the AO were deleted as the assessees successfully demonstrated the genuineness of the transactions. Additionally, the disallowance of interest on loans was overturned by the Tribunal, recognizing the genuine nature of the loans used for business purposes. The Tribunal also acknowledged the allowability of education cess but dismissed the claim due to the lack of actual payment for the relevant year. Procedural issues regarding scrutiny conversion and notice issuance were not addressed as the additions were deleted based on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 45 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400290</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, finding sufficient evidence to prove the identity and creditworthiness of the lenders under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The additions made by the AO were deleted as the assessees successfully demonstrated the genuineness of the transactions. Additionally, the disallowance of interest on loans was overturned by the Tribunal, recognizing the genuine nature of the loans used for business purposes. The Tribunal also acknowledged the allowability of education cess but dismissed the claim due to the lack of actual payment for the relevant year. Procedural issues regarding scrutiny conversion and notice issuance were not addressed as the additions were deleted based on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>