<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1812 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291254</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to deposit the difference in tax amount under protest within two weeks for registration restoration. The application for re-registration was to be considered within a further two weeks. The judgment aimed to facilitate compliance with tax obligations, registration reinstatement, and continuation of business activities promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1812 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291254</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to deposit the difference in tax amount under protest within two weeks for registration restoration. The application for re-registration was to be considered within a further two weeks. The judgment aimed to facilitate compliance with tax obligations, registration reinstatement, and continuation of business activities promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>