https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291242 Alleged non-compliance with directions on surrender and reallocation of admissions seats, together with inconsistent and misleading statements about the candidates included in the Directorate's list, led the Supreme Court to require the concerned officers to explain their conduct. On the record before it, the Court considered a contempt notice appropriate because the apparent disobedience of earlier directions raised a prima facie issue under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Notice was therefore issued to the officers to show cause why they should not be proceeded against and punished for contempt. en-us Fri, 14 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Nov 2020 18:15:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291242 Alleged non-compliance with directions on surrender and reallocation of admissions seats, together with inconsistent and misleading statements about the candidates included in the Directorate's list, led the Supreme Court to require the concerned officers to explain their conduct. On the record before it, the Court considered a contempt notice appropriate because the apparent disobedience of earlier directions raised a prima facie issue under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Notice was therefore issued to the officers to show cause why they should not be proceeded against and punished for contempt. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291242