<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 46 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23678</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the amount received for vacating business premises was a capital receipt, not subject to capital gains tax due to the unascertainable cost of acquisition for the tenancy right. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation and cited precedents to support its decision. The case was forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:50:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 46 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23678</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the amount received for vacating business premises was a capital receipt, not subject to capital gains tax due to the unascertainable cost of acquisition for the tenancy right. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation and cited precedents to support its decision. The case was forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>