<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1571 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291214</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, a club service provider, in a tax dispute regarding minimum billing charges received from members for non-provision of service. The Tribunal held that such amounts were not taxable before 1-7-2012 as they did not align with the definition of taxable service. For the period after 1-7-2012, the Tribunal upheld the tax already paid by the Appellant. Additionally, the Tribunal found the tax demand for the period 2007 to 2012 to be time-barred due to the department dropping the audit query on minimum billing taxability before 2007. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the tax demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1571 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291214</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, a club service provider, in a tax dispute regarding minimum billing charges received from members for non-provision of service. The Tribunal held that such amounts were not taxable before 1-7-2012 as they did not align with the definition of taxable service. For the period after 1-7-2012, the Tribunal upheld the tax already paid by the Appellant. Additionally, the Tribunal found the tax demand for the period 2007 to 2012 to be time-barred due to the department dropping the audit query on minimum billing taxability before 2007. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the tax demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>