<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1302 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291228</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, quashing the reassessment order for the assessment year 2011-2012 and allowing the expenses disallowed for both assessment years 2011-2012 and 2013-2014. The Tribunal emphasized that reopening based on a change of opinion is not permissible and that the assessee was entitled to claim the expenses under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 14:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1302 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291228</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, quashing the reassessment order for the assessment year 2011-2012 and allowing the expenses disallowed for both assessment years 2011-2012 and 2013-2014. The Tribunal emphasized that reopening based on a change of opinion is not permissible and that the assessee was entitled to claim the expenses under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>