<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1995 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291232</link>
    <description>Royalty paid for mining activities was treated as subject to GST under the reverse charge mechanism, and the existing GST return and payment procedure was to continue. On that accepted position, the departmental letter could not validly authorise collection of GST on royalty from mining lease holders by any contrary method. The court therefore found no need for further adjudication on the communication and quashed the impugned letter dated 8-11-2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1995 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291232</link>
      <description>Royalty paid for mining activities was treated as subject to GST under the reverse charge mechanism, and the existing GST return and payment procedure was to continue. On that accepted position, the departmental letter could not validly authorise collection of GST on royalty from mining lease holders by any contrary method. The court therefore found no need for further adjudication on the communication and quashed the impugned letter dated 8-11-2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>