<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1921 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291231</link>
    <description>The Allahabad High Court directed the State to release the petitioner&#039;s goods seized for E-way Bill non-presentation, as the State failed to justify its refusal to accept the E-way Bill despite the petitioner&#039;s compliance within two hours. The court highlighted the GST Council&#039;s recommendation suspending the E-way Bill requirement and deemed the demand for the E-way Bill and cash security as unjustified. The petitioner was instructed to deposit security equivalent to 50% of the goods&#039; value in a non-cash form for release, subject to penalty proceedings, emphasizing adherence to regulations and fairness in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1921 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291231</link>
      <description>The Allahabad High Court directed the State to release the petitioner&#039;s goods seized for E-way Bill non-presentation, as the State failed to justify its refusal to accept the E-way Bill despite the petitioner&#039;s compliance within two hours. The court highlighted the GST Council&#039;s recommendation suspending the E-way Bill requirement and deemed the demand for the E-way Bill and cash security as unjustified. The petitioner was instructed to deposit security equivalent to 50% of the goods&#039; value in a non-cash form for release, subject to penalty proceedings, emphasizing adherence to regulations and fairness in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>