<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 33 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400278</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court granted permission for the withdrawal of civil appeals/special leave petitions, resulting in their dismissal. Despite the withdrawal, the Court kept the question of law open for future consideration, indicating potential broader implications. The judgment focused on procedural aspects rather than delving into specific legal issues, highlighting the complexity of the case. The decision to preserve the question of law suggests significant legal principles at play.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 14:47:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 33 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400278</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court granted permission for the withdrawal of civil appeals/special leave petitions, resulting in their dismissal. Despite the withdrawal, the Court kept the question of law open for future consideration, indicating potential broader implications. The judgment focused on procedural aspects rather than delving into specific legal issues, highlighting the complexity of the case. The decision to preserve the question of law suggests significant legal principles at play.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>